CURRENCYHUB

Currency Pair

PGK to RWF Currency Converter

1 PGK = 331.385198 RWF

Papua New Guinean Kina (PGK)Rwandan Franc (RWF)
Reference rateProvider: Frankfurter

Currency Converter

PGK to RWF

From currency
1 PGK331.385198 RWFFrankfurter

You receive

RWF331.3852
To currency

1 PGK = 331.3852 RWF

Verified rateFrankfurter

Conversion summary

1 PGK331.3852 RWF

PGKRWF compares the Papua New Guinean Kina with the Rwandan Franc using the latest available reference rate.

140 currenciesVerified rateHistorical dataTransparent methodologyDedicated currency-pair pages

Quick convert

Estimate provider fees
Fee estimate
Reference conversion
331.3852 RWF
Estimated percentage cost
0 RWF
Fixed service fee
0 PGK
Estimated amount received
331.3852 RWF

This estimate uses the values you enter. Banks and transfer providers may use different rates and fees.

Papua New Guinea flagPGKPapua New Guinean KinaRwanda flagRWFRwandan Franc

Convert Papua New Guinean kina to Rwandan francs, compare the current exchange rate, simulate common transfer fees and review historical movement.

Current Rate Summary

Current PGK to RWF exchange rate

1 PGK = 331.385198 RWF

1 RWF = 0.0030176363 PGK

Rate date
Provider
Frankfurter
Rate type
Reference only

Historical Chart

PGK/RWF rate history

Previous publication
-0.03%
7-day change
-0.29%
30-day change
-1.74%
90-day change
-2.28%

Range: 330.830182348.967715 RWF; average 340.14843 RWF.

View historical chart

Currency Relationship

About this currency pair

Papua New Guinean Kina to Rwandan Franc: currency reference context

PGK/RWF compares Papua New Guinean Kina with Rwandan Franc in a clear base-to-quote direction.

The direction identifies the base and quote currencies.

Fees and spreads are not included in the reference result.

Common uses

  • Reference conversion
  • Record keeping
  • Provider comparison
Read the related exchange-rate guide

Currency Knowledge

About PGK and RWF

About PGK

Papua New Guinean Kina

Symbol
K
Country or area
Papua New Guinea
Region
Oceania
Central bank
Bank of Papua New Guinea
Learn more about PGK

About RWF

Rwandan Franc

Symbol
FRw
Country or area
Rwanda
Region
Africa
Central bank
National Bank of Rwanda
Learn more about RWF

Quick Conversion Table

Common PGK and RWF amounts

Exchange-rate information is provided for reference only and is not financial, trading or investment advice.

PGKRWF
1 PGK331.3852 RWF
5 PGK1,656.93 RWF
10 PGK3,313.85 RWF
20 PGK6,627.70 RWF
25 PGK8,284.63 RWF
RWFPGK
1 RWF0.003018 PGK
5 RWF0.015088 PGK
10 RWF0.030176 PGK
20 RWF0.060353 PGK
25 RWF0.075441 PGK
Show more common amounts
50 PGK16,569.26 RWF
100 PGK33,138.52 RWF
250 PGK82,846.30 RWF
500 PGK165,692.60 RWF
1,000 PGK331,385.20 RWF
5,000 PGK1,656,925.99 RWF
50 RWF0.150882 PGK
100 RWF0.301764 PGK
250 RWF0.754409 PGK
500 RWF1.5088 PGK
1,000 RWF3.0176 PGK
5,000 RWF15.0882 PGK

FAQ

PGK to RWF questions

What does PGK to RWF mean?

PGK to RWF treats Papua New Guinean Kina as the starting currency and Rwandan Franc as the result currency. A rate of 1 PGK = X RWF shows how many rwandan francs one papua new guinean kina represents at the stated rate date.

How do I convert PGK to RWF?

Enter an amount in Papua New Guinean kina, then CurrencyHub shows the equivalent value in Rwandan francs when the latest provider reference rate is available.

Why does the PGK/RWF exchange rate change?

PGK/RWF can move as economic conditions, monetary policy expectations and demand for each currency change. For this pair, the direction identifies the base and quote currencies.

How current is the PGK to RWF rate?

The page displays the provider's latest available reference-rate date beside the result. It updates when a new dated publication is accepted into CurrencyHub's shared rate snapshot.

Is the PGK to RWF rate shown here a bank rate?

No. CurrencyHub shows reference exchange-rate information when provider data is available. Banks, card networks and money transfer providers may apply spreads or fees.

Sources and review

Rate data and editorial sources

Data source: Frankfurter

Rate date:

Editorially reviewed:

Report an error