CURRENCYHUB

Currency Pair

MOP to XCG Currency Converter

1 MOP = 0.22178377 XCG

Macanese Pataca (MOP)Caribbean Guilder (XCG)
Reference rateProvider: Frankfurter

Currency Converter

MOP to XCG

From currency
1 MOP0.22178377 XCGFrankfurter

You receive

XCG0.221784
To currency

1 MOP = 0.221784 XCG

Verified rateFrankfurter

Conversion summary

1 MOP0.221784 XCG

MOPXCG compares the Macanese Pataca with the Caribbean Guilder using the latest available reference rate.

140 currenciesVerified rateHistorical dataTransparent methodologyDedicated currency-pair pages

Quick convert

Estimate provider fees
Fee estimate
Reference conversion
0.221784 XCG
Estimated percentage cost
0 XCG
Fixed service fee
0 MOP
Estimated amount received
0.221784 XCG

This estimate uses the values you enter. Banks and transfer providers may use different rates and fees.

Macao flagMOPMacanese PatacaCaribbean guilder monetary area iconXCGCaribbean Guilder

Convert Macanese patacas to Caribbean guilders, compare the current exchange rate, simulate common transfer fees and review historical movement.

Current Rate Summary

Current MOP to XCG exchange rate

1 MOP = 0.22178377 XCG

1 XCG = 4.508896 MOP

Rate date
Provider
Frankfurter
Rate type
Reference only

Historical Chart

MOP/XCG rate history

Previous publication
-0.04%
7-day change
-0.30%
30-day change
+0.03%
90-day change
-0.69%

Range: 0.220442860.22514076 XCG; average 0.22294423 XCG.

View historical chart

Currency Relationship

About this currency pair

Macanese Pataca to Caribbean Guilder: currency reference context

MOP/XCG compares Macanese Pataca with Caribbean Guilder in a clear base-to-quote direction.

The direction identifies the base and quote currencies.

Fees and spreads are not included in the reference result.

Common uses

  • Reference conversion
  • Record keeping
  • Provider comparison
Read the related exchange-rate guide

Currency Knowledge

About MOP and XCG

About MOP

Macanese Pataca

Symbol
P
Country or area
Macao
Region
Asia Pacific
Central bank
Monetary Authority of Macao
Learn more about MOP

About XCG

Caribbean Guilder

Symbol
Cg
Country or area
Curaçao and Sint Maarten
Region
Americas
Central bank
Centrale Bank van Curaçao en Sint Maarten (CBCS)
Learn more about XCG

Quick Conversion Table

Common MOP and XCG amounts

Exchange-rate information is provided for reference only and is not financial, trading or investment advice.

MOPXCG
1 MOP0.221784 XCG
5 MOP1.1089 XCG
10 MOP2.2178 XCG
20 MOP4.4357 XCG
25 MOP5.5446 XCG
XCGMOP
1 XCG4.5089 MOP
5 XCG22.5445 MOP
10 XCG45.089 MOP
20 XCG90.1779 MOP
25 XCG112.7224 MOP
Show more common amounts
50 MOP11.0892 XCG
100 MOP22.1784 XCG
250 MOP55.4459 XCG
500 MOP110.8919 XCG
1,000 MOP221.7838 XCG
5,000 MOP1,108.92 XCG
50 XCG225.4448 MOP
100 XCG450.8896 MOP
250 XCG1,127.22 MOP
500 XCG2,254.45 MOP
1,000 XCG4,508.90 MOP
5,000 XCG22,544.48 MOP

FAQ

MOP to XCG questions

What does MOP to XCG mean?

MOP to XCG treats Macanese Pataca as the starting currency and Caribbean Guilder as the result currency. A rate of 1 MOP = X XCG shows how many caribbean guilders one macanese pataca represents at the stated rate date.

How do I convert MOP to XCG?

Enter an amount in Macanese patacas, then CurrencyHub shows the equivalent value in Caribbean guilders when the latest provider reference rate is available.

Why does the MOP/XCG exchange rate change?

MOP/XCG can move as economic conditions, monetary policy expectations and demand for each currency change. For this pair, the direction identifies the base and quote currencies.

How current is the MOP to XCG rate?

The page displays the provider's latest available reference-rate date beside the result. It updates when a new dated publication is accepted into CurrencyHub's shared rate snapshot.

Is the MOP to XCG rate shown here a bank rate?

No. CurrencyHub shows reference exchange-rate information when provider data is available. Banks, card networks and money transfer providers may apply spreads or fees.

Sources and review

Rate data and editorial sources

Data source: Frankfurter

Rate date:

Editorially reviewed:

Report an error