CURRENCYHUB

Currency Pair

KES to PGK Currency Converter

1 KES = 0.03424109 PGK

Kenyan Shilling (KES)Papua New Guinean Kina (PGK)
Reference rateProvider: Frankfurter

Currency Converter

KES to PGK

From currency
1 KES0.03424109 PGKFrankfurter

You receive

PGK0.034241
To currency

1 KES = 0.034241 PGK

Verified rateFrankfurter

Conversion summary

1 KES0.034241 PGK

KESPGK compares the Kenyan Shilling with the Papua New Guinean Kina using the latest available reference rate.

140 currenciesVerified rateHistorical dataTransparent methodologyDedicated currency-pair pages

Quick convert

Estimate provider fees
Fee estimate
Reference conversion
0.034241 PGK
Estimated percentage cost
0 PGK
Fixed service fee
0 KES
Estimated amount received
0.034241 PGK

This estimate uses the values you enter. Banks and transfer providers may use different rates and fees.

Kenya flagKESKenyan ShillingPapua New Guinea flagPGKPapua New Guinean Kina

Convert Kenyan shillings to Papua New Guinean kina, compare the current exchange rate, simulate common transfer fees and review historical movement.

Current Rate Summary

Current KES to PGK exchange rate

1 KES = 0.03424109 PGK

1 PGK = 29.204679 KES

Rate date
Provider
Frankfurter
Rate type
Reference only

Historical Chart

KES/PGK rate history

Previous publication
-0.04%
7-day change
+0.06%
30-day change
+1.22%
90-day change
+2.81%

Range: 0.032095640.03435594 PGK; average 0.03320528 PGK.

View historical chart

Currency Relationship

About this currency pair

Kenyan Shilling to Papua New Guinean Kina: currency reference context

KES/PGK compares Kenyan Shilling with Papua New Guinean Kina in a clear base-to-quote direction.

The direction identifies the base and quote currencies.

Fees and spreads are not included in the reference result.

Common uses

  • Reference conversion
  • Record keeping
  • Provider comparison
Read the related exchange-rate guide

Currency Knowledge

About KES and PGK

About KES

Kenyan Shilling

Symbol
KSh
Country or area
Kenya
Region
Africa
Central bank
Central Bank of Kenya
Learn more about KES

About PGK

Papua New Guinean Kina

Symbol
K
Country or area
Papua New Guinea
Region
Oceania
Central bank
Bank of Papua New Guinea
Learn more about PGK

Quick Conversion Table

Common KES and PGK amounts

Exchange-rate information is provided for reference only and is not financial, trading or investment advice.

KESPGK
1 KES0.034241 PGK
5 KES0.171205 PGK
10 KES0.342411 PGK
20 KES0.684822 PGK
25 KES0.856027 PGK
PGKKES
1 PGK29.2047 KES
5 PGK146.0234 KES
10 PGK292.0468 KES
20 PGK584.0936 KES
25 PGK730.117 KES
Show more common amounts
50 KES1.7121 PGK
100 KES3.4241 PGK
250 KES8.5603 PGK
500 KES17.1205 PGK
1,000 KES34.2411 PGK
5,000 KES171.2054 PGK
50 PGK1,460.23 KES
100 PGK2,920.47 KES
250 PGK7,301.17 KES
500 PGK14,602.34 KES
1,000 PGK29,204.68 KES
5,000 PGK146,023.39 KES

FAQ

KES to PGK questions

What does KES to PGK mean?

KES to PGK treats Kenyan Shilling as the starting currency and Papua New Guinean Kina as the result currency. A rate of 1 KES = X PGK shows how many papua new guinean kina one kenyan shilling represents at the stated rate date.

How do I convert KES to PGK?

Enter an amount in Kenyan shillings, then CurrencyHub shows the equivalent value in Papua New Guinean kina when the latest provider reference rate is available.

Why does the KES/PGK exchange rate change?

KES/PGK can move as economic conditions, monetary policy expectations and demand for each currency change. For this pair, the direction identifies the base and quote currencies.

How current is the KES to PGK rate?

The page displays the provider's latest available reference-rate date beside the result. It updates when a new dated publication is accepted into CurrencyHub's shared rate snapshot.

Is the KES to PGK rate shown here a bank rate?

No. CurrencyHub shows reference exchange-rate information when provider data is available. Banks, card networks and money transfer providers may apply spreads or fees.

Sources and review

Rate data and editorial sources

Data source: Frankfurter

Rate date:

Editorially reviewed:

Report an error