CURRENCYHUB

Currency Pair

GHS to BWP Currency Converter

1 GHS = 1.165953 BWP

Ghanaian Cedi (GHS)Botswana Pula (BWP)
Reference rateProvider: Frankfurter

Currency Converter

GHS to BWP

From currency
1 GHS1.165953 BWPFrankfurter

You receive

BWP1.166
To currency

1 GHS = 1.166 BWP

Verified rateFrankfurter

Conversion summary

1 GHS1.166 BWP

GHS → BWP compares the Ghanaian Cedi with the Botswana Pula using the latest available reference rate.

140 currenciesVerified rateHistorical dataTransparent methodologyDedicated currency-pair pages

Quick convert

Estimate provider fees
Fee estimate
Reference conversion
1.166 BWP
Estimated percentage cost
0 BWP
Fixed service fee
0 GHS
Estimated amount received
1.166 BWP

This estimate uses the values you enter. Banks and transfer providers may use different rates and fees.

Ghana flagGHSGhanaian CediBotswana flagBWPBotswana Pula

Convert Ghanaian cedis to Botswana pula, compare the current exchange rate, simulate common transfer fees and review historical movement.

Current Rate Summary

Current GHS to BWP exchange rate

1 GHS = 1.165953 BWP

1 BWP = 0.85766754 GHS

Rate date
Provider
Frankfurter
Rate type
Reference only

Historical Chart

GHS/BWP rate history

Previous publication
+0.85%
7-day change
+1.83%
30-day change
+0.28%
90-day change
-3.66%

Range: 1.128072–1.292758 BWP; average 1.196624 BWP.

View historical chart

Currency Relationship

About this currency pair

Ghanaian Cedi to Botswana Pula: africa currency context

Ghanaian Cedi and Botswana Pula are associated with the same broad region, while remaining separate monetary units with their own issuing arrangements.

The currencies are associated with the same broad region but remain separate monetary units.

Provider fees and local payment rules can change the final amount received.

Common uses

  • Regional travel budgets
  • Cross-border invoices
  • Comparing local payment options
Read the related exchange-rate guide

Currency Knowledge

About GHS and BWP

About GHS

Ghanaian Cedi

Symbol
GH₵
Country or area
Ghana
Region
Africa
Central bank
Bank of Ghana
Learn more about GHS

About BWP

Botswana Pula

Symbol
P
Country or area
Botswana
Region
Africa
Central bank
Bank of Botswana
Learn more about BWP

Quick Conversion Table

Common GHS and BWP amounts

Exchange-rate information is provided for reference only and is not financial, trading or investment advice.

GHSBWP
1 GHS1.166 BWP
5 GHS5.8298 BWP
10 GHS11.6595 BWP
20 GHS23.3191 BWP
25 GHS29.1488 BWP
BWPGHS
1 BWP0.857668 GHS
5 BWP4.2883 GHS
10 BWP8.5767 GHS
20 BWP17.1534 GHS
25 BWP21.4417 GHS
Show more common amounts
50 GHS58.2976 BWP
100 GHS116.5953 BWP
250 GHS291.4882 BWP
500 GHS582.9765 BWP
1,000 GHS1,165.95 BWP
5,000 GHS5,829.76 BWP
50 BWP42.8834 GHS
100 BWP85.7668 GHS
250 BWP214.4169 GHS
500 BWP428.8338 GHS
1,000 BWP857.6675 GHS
5,000 BWP4,288.34 GHS

FAQ

GHS to BWP questions

What does GHS to BWP mean?

GHS to BWP treats Ghanaian Cedi as the starting currency and Botswana Pula as the result currency. A rate of 1 GHS = X BWP shows how many botswana pula one ghanaian cedi represents at the stated rate date.

How do I convert GHS to BWP?

Enter an amount in Ghanaian cedis, then CurrencyHub shows the equivalent value in Botswana pula when the latest provider reference rate is available.

Why does the GHS/BWP exchange rate change?

GHS/BWP can move as economic conditions, monetary policy expectations and demand for each currency change. For this pair, the currencies are associated with the same broad region but remain separate monetary units.

How current is the GHS to BWP rate?

The page displays the provider's latest available reference-rate date beside the result. It updates when a new dated publication is accepted into CurrencyHub's shared rate snapshot.

Is the GHS to BWP rate shown here a bank rate?

No. CurrencyHub shows reference exchange-rate information when provider data is available. Banks, card networks and money transfer providers may apply spreads or fees.

Sources and review

Rate data and editorial sources

Data source: Frankfurter

Rate date:

Editorially reviewed:

Report an error